Public officials must preserve e-mail records

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

"In New Hampshire it is not uncommon for elected and appointed officials to use their home computers to transact official business. When they do, they must follow procedures to ensure that the governmental records they create or receive are accessible to their public bodies and publicly available for the requisite statutory period."

 

 

The Concord Monitor

 

By WILLIAM L. CHAPMAN

 

July 19, 2008 - 12:00 am

 

Earlier this week, the Concord Monitor carried an article by the Associated Press reporting on a 50-state survey it had conducted on the retention of government e-mail. The survey found that "most of the states with e-mail laws allow officials to choose which ones to turn over in Freedom of Information requests and to decide on their own when e-mail records are deleted."

Public officials in New Hampshire have no such discretion. They must retain all their government e-mail and make it available to the public for the same period as governmental records in paper form. To the extent there might have been any question about the retention and public availability of government e-mail, it has been answered by House Bill 1408, which Gov. John Lynch signed into law earlier this month.

TOP

 

 

Earlier this week, the Concord Monitor carried an article by the Associated Press reporting on a 50-state survey it had conducted on the retention of government e-mail. The survey found that "most of the states with e-mail laws allow officials to choose which ones to turn over in Freedom of Information requests and to decide on their own when e-mail records are deleted."

Public officials in New Hampshire have no such discretion. They must retain all their government e-mail and make it available to the public for the same period as governmental records in paper form. To the extent there might have been any question about the retention and public availability of government e-mail, it has been answered by House Bill 1408, which Gov. John Lynch signed into law earlier this month.

TOP

House Bill 1408 is the Legislature's response to a request by the Supreme Court in the 2001 Hawkins case to examine and update the Right-to-Know Law "in the context of advancing computer technology." It represents the hard and commendable work of the Right-to-Know Oversight Commission, chaired by Republican Rep. John Thomas of Belmont.

The new law updates and clarifies the Right-to- Know Law in a number of respects, several dealing specifically with e-mail and other electronic records. The law requires that "governmental records" in electronic form, such as e-mail, "remain accessible for the same retention periods as their paper counterparts." Those periods are set by RSA Ch. 33-A, which governs the management and retention of municipal records.

"Governmental records," a defined term under the new law, include "any information created, accepted or obtained by, or on behalf of, any public body, or a quorum or majority thereof . . . in furtherance of its official function." What must be understood is that governmental records can include not only e-mail created or received by a public body's computer, but also e-mail created or received by a public official's "personal" or "home" computer.

In New Hampshire it is not uncommon for elected and appointed officials to use their home computers to transact official business. When they do, they must follow procedures to ensure that the governmental records they create or receive are accessible to their public bodies and publicly available for the requisite statutory period.

TOP

 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Public officials must preserve e-mail records.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://moultonboroughcitizensalliance.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/299

1 Comments

NH said:

They also must post their meeting minutes in a timely fashion on the web or make them available otherwise.

They cannot stop you from airing taped meetings. It’s the law.

Specifically, RSA 91-A

If the Selectmen will not allow you to air their meetings on public TV I do believe you can take them to court over this.

It’s pretty simple.. Most towns voluntarily air their meetings. It’s the best way to cover their obligations under RSA 91-A.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Otis published on July 26, 2008 3:00 PM.

Where the real excitement is in Moultonboro was the previous entry in this blog.

Gregg would double home heating aid is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01