To table or not to table? Which is it?

Here’s something to question. At the July 2^nd Board of Selectmen meeting, the board decided to agree with a member of the audience, and the new Heritage Commission, to not proceed with writing an ordinance, that once written, would be a legally binding document. They decided to table the issue. However, when the discussion turned to the Capital Improvement Program Committee, #7 on the agenda, the decision was made to discuss both the Heritage Commission and CIPC ordinances at a public hearing on July 30^th. Which is it?

And why does our Town Administrator insist on bringing this issue back to the table to discuss? The Board already voted and made a decision. For once, we agree with their decision and feel that these committees need to go forth and prosper without interference! Let’s let them meet, unite and begin their journey as a committee.